Anyway, you've already compared the files, and they are the same. (I was afraid that might happen...) Maybe flyingmoose's more recent reply has the part you really need -- one can only hope. At least you've proven that there was no pollution of the data up to that point -- the problem involves one of the Tk modules.
In reply to Re^5: PAR and Tk
by graff
in thread PAR and Tk
by nornagon
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |