Thanks.
I knew I was missing something.
So if I follow jeffa's suggestion of merging the sessions and sessions_metadata tables so that I have a single sessions table with a (non-primary-key) foreign key to the users table then all should be fluffy and I can stop banging my head off the desk...?
...or I could use might_have, which works fine. Sigh. that'll teach me to read docs properly...
Cheers guys,
Cxx
In reply to Re: Re: Class::DBI has_a relationships
by CassJ
in thread Class::DBI has_a relationships
by CassJ
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |