I am gonna go out on a limb and wildly speculate that if one of them uses 96MB and the tests are accurate, it was *map*, based on the whole 'side-effect' thingy. If true, this re-emphasizes the original point that this is the one (non-preference-based) difference.
In reply to Re: Re: Re: When would you choose foreach instead of map?
by dimar
in thread When would you choose foreach instead of map?
by jpfarmer
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |