Why did it change? If you have a flat data-structure then CSV is obviously a better choice than XML. It's more compact, probably faster to parse and probably faster to generate. I'd say go back to CSV and check out the excellent Text::CSV_XS.
-sam
In reply to Re: quickest way to parse pidgeon XML?
by samtregar
in thread quickest way to parse pidgeon XML?
by amazotron
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |