Modules specifically written for companies will generally not get released due to ownership issues, but often they're just written for specific in house tasks which are not that useful to anyone else (apart from the odd competitor!)
From my own experience, you might be surprised how much CPAN code does get used by companies. I don't want people to stop releasing modules to CPAN because there's some great stuff out there, and I don't expect them to be perfect either - mine certainly aren't!
It's just that recently when auditing potential modules for our own use, I've seen a few that don't check for write failures and that worries me a bit - I can't see any situation where that's a good idea.
I suppose I'm trying to say if an author writes a module to scratch an itch - fantastic, but please think about proper error checking before releasing it to CPAN because many other people may start to depend on it :)
In reply to Re: Re: Re: Re: <rant>CPAN modules failing to check for write errors</rant>
by Anonymous Monk
in thread <rant>CPAN modules failing to check for write errors</rant>
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |