Sorry, but it sounds like a first-year model of mathematics. Sounds like a first-year view of programming, too.
You seem to define the universe in terms of the constructs your programming language allows. That's like those arguments that native Amricans are incapable of untruth because native languages don't have a word for "lie" ( I just made that exampole up. ) These arguments usually point out the dozens of supposed words in Inuit for snow ... ignore the dozens of words in English for snow; corn, powder, sleet, slush, crust, pack, .....
The challenge is to come up with a model of the universe, and implement a programming language that reflects your model. Of course, coming up with one new feature is a challenge for most people, so not many implement a totally different world view.
--
TTTATCGGTCGTTATATAGATGTTTGCA
In reply to Re: The recurring model
by TomDLux
in thread The recurring model
by bl0rf
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |