For something a bit more in depth, I would actually recommend XML::LibXML over XML::DOM. XML::LibXML is actively maintained and is lightning fast. XML::DOM got somewhat neglected by Enno until TJ Mather rescued it last year and put out a release.
Personally I use XML::LibXML both for it's speed (based on libxml2 instead of expat) and because it validates XML against DTDs nicely.
Oh, did I mention how fast XML::LibXML is?
In reply to Re^2: XML module advice
by vek
in thread XML module advice
by fuzzyping
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |