I think what diotalevi is trying to acheive is the reverse of B's next method, a new previous method. Yes? If so, then I think that your snippet would be fine (although I don't muck around with the B modules much).
In reply to Re: Find opcode's reverse sibling?
by Mr. Muskrat
in thread Find opcode's reverse sibling?
by diotalevi
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |