Some source code reading revealed the answer. I thought that this was a deeper thing than it is. op_seq is zero before the peep-hole optimizer runs on some code and non-zero afterwards as a flag to prevent the optimizer from running again.
I now wonder how Simon got a handle to some code before the optimizer took hold of it. Hmm...
In reply to Re: When is an opcode's ->seq empty?
by diotalevi
in thread When is an opcode's ->seq empty?
by diotalevi
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |