Consideration is the process of giving careful thought to something, not at all heavy handed.
I'm talking about a pattern in the use of Perl Monks' consideration system, not the word "consideration" or the concept it defines. Perhaps I didn't make myself sufficiently clear.
While "consideration" may not be heavy handed, any system that allows editors to effectively re-write a bit of history (with a certain degree of consensus, of course) can't help but be heavy handed. In editorial cases, it can -- and should -- be a method of last resort. For the most part, we seem to be able to use consideration responsibly and moderately; I'd like it to stay that way.
Let us not censure consideration, for it too is part of our freedom here.
I have not attacked the consideration system; I've merely tried to point out (again; kudra did an excellent job a while ago) that the system needs to be used with care. Please keep in mind that not every criticism of a component of a system is an attack on the system itself.
--
F
o
x
t
r
o
t
U
n
i
f
o
r
m
Found a typo in this node? /msg me
% man 3 strfry
In reply to Re^2: Careless Consideration Considered Harmful
by FoxtrotUniform
in thread Careless Consideration Considered Harmful
by FoxtrotUniform
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |