Don't use single-word, all-lower-case subroutine names. If you do, then you can reduce your risk by either calling them like &mysub(...) or by putting them into a module (and then import them, use the full name with package name in front, or use OO).
I can see there is a potential problem in that calling single word subroutines without parentheses can be confusing to the parser, but what's the difference in this regard between all-lower-case subroutines and (for example) CamelCase subroutines? Or are you warning against redefining future keywords/build-ins?
Joost.
In reply to Re^2: Bad news for IO::Handle magic (SWYM or sink)
by Joost
in thread Bad news for IO::Handle magic
by Stevie-O
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |