However, if you can show me a useful application of using more than half a dozen or so simultaneous threads, I'll show you a better way :)I don't mean to disagree with this - in fact I think you're right, but I would be very interested to read an elaboration on this claim from you. Would you?
In reply to Re^6: Win32 and threads;
by pbeckingham
in thread Win32 and threads;
by jammin2night
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |