I'm a little skeptical of using a date as a primary key (unless it's a composite one), but I'm sure someone out there could think up a reason.
Actually, I'm against the idea of using any meaningful data as a primary key. Auto-incremented fields are much safer.
----
send money to your kernel via the boot loader.. This and more wisdom available from Markov Hardburn.
In reply to Re^2: Expand Class::DBI Field to DateTime Object
by hardburn
in thread Expand Class::DBI Field to DateTime Object
by hardburn
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |