Benchmark: timing 100000 iterations of Reference Implementation, Rever +se Array, Shorter Array, strftime... Reference Implementation: 1 wallclock secs ( 0.66 usr + 0.03 sys = +0.69 CPU) @ 144927.54/s (n=100000) Reverse Array: 1 wallclock secs ( 0.85 usr + 0.03 sys = 0.88 CPU) @ + 113636.36/s (n=100000) Shorter Array: 0 wallclock secs ( 0.63 usr + 0.04 sys = 0.67 CPU) @ + 149253.73/s (n=100000) strftime: 1 wallclock secs ( 0.52 usr + 0.07 sys = 0.59 CPU) @ 16 +9491.53/s (n=100000) Rate Reverse Array Reference Implementati +on Shorter Array strftime Reverse Array 113636/s -- -2 +2% -24% -33% Reference Implementation 144928/s 28% +-- -3% -14% Shorter Array 149254/s 31% +3% -- -12% strftime 169492/s 49% 1 +7% 14% --
In reply to Re: datetimestamp faster/golf/prettier
by Jaap
in thread datetimestamp faster/golf/prettier
by Jaap
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |