I will note, however, that the main problem I see in this regex is the unescaped front slashes, "/", which should be written "\/" when they're inside the regex. Also (correct me if I'm wrong I'm not so good at regex myself), doesn't * include 0 instances of a character, making the ? unnecessary?
LassiLantar
In reply to Re: capture psudo tags
by LassiLantar
in thread capture psudo tags
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |