I sounded a bit pedantic, I regret to admit.no no, i think it's absolutely right to suggest an alternative like coderefs in a hash whenever such a question arises. those who don't know what kind of problems &{'subname'} can bring with it will appreciate it.
i still wish i head read the docs more carefully before asking and then reading it ten minutes after, but, interesting, after asking around it turns out that i'm not the only one who missed that strict-exception. =)
In reply to Re^4: strict and symbolic subroutine refs
by tinita
in thread strict and symbolic subroutine refs
by tinita
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |