To be honest, I don't have the patience to do this manually, right now. A much more interesting problem would be writing a somewhat generic algorithm to create such regexes. I posted a regex generator for a closely related problem to the fun-with-perl list a while ago. Since adapting it to your question would take more fiddling than I currently have the stamina for, I'll simply outline the structure of the resulting regex (written in /x syntax for the purposes of this post):
0* (?: 1\d? | 2 (?: [0-4]\d? | 5[0-5]? ) ) (?: (?: # since we got here, the first 1-3 digits formed a number +< 256 # so allow a dot \. # a near-copy of the surrounding regex goes here to match +next octet ) | # no dot matched: allow digit-only strings forming numbers up +to 2**32-1 # (and remember we might already have matched up to 3 digits!) # this bit needs adjusting to smaller ranges in the nested cop +ies )
You can see that it's highly formulaic.
It might make an interesting project to generalize a few numeral-matching pattern builders sufficiently to make them into a module (if such a thing doesn't already exist). I've built such regexen by hand often enough that I've gotten thoroughly sick of doing it; it's a nearly trivial but mind numbingly tedious task.
Makeshifts last the longest.
In reply to Re: (Golf) Expression for matching numeric IP addresses
by Aristotle
in thread (Golf) Expression for matching numeric IP addresses
by trantor
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |