there's no 'problem' with the results I just found it odd that each thread had reportedly processed 256 consecutive items even though they weren't actually done consecutively.
Sample output:
10 threads started - waiting on completion. Computer000257 checked by -378 Computer000513 checked by -380 Computer000769 checked by -349 Computer001025 checked by -366 Computer001281 checked by -326 Computer001537 checked by -305 Computer001793 checked by -338 Computer002049 checked by -360 Computer002305 checked by -127 Computer000002 checked by -373 Computer000258 checked by -378 Computer000514 checked by -380The input is sequential, Computer000000 - Computer10000. I just though it was 'wierd'.
In reply to Re^2: Unexpected output from fork (Win32)
by maa
in thread Unexpected output from fork (Win32)
by maa
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |