The reason I ask is that some of the *DBM mechanisms use "holey" (sparse) files where their size is bigger than the amount of disk blocks they actually take. If there is a block that is totally empty, it doesn't use up a disk block even though it shows up in the file size.
In reply to Re: size on disk of tied hashes
by ctilmes
in thread size on disk of tied hashes
by danderson
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |