In CPAN has a (beta) rating system a few monks weighed in that ratings without reviews are not particularly useful.
I'm wondering if opinions have changed in the last year or so? Should we consider ratings without reviews a good practice, or a harmful one?
Can writing reviews be limited to low rating submissions and high ratings politely skip them?
--Solo
--
You said you wanted to be around when I made a mistake; well, this could be it, sweetheart.
In reply to CPAN ratings without reviews harmful or not? by Solo
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |