What this tells me about the chatterbox is that people really do treat it as chatter, as a written version of a spoken conversation. And as you say, there is a fascinating deviation from the spoken paradigm when people inject detailed perl code or site references. Such detailed information probably could not be remebered easily in spoken conversation, but it works well here.
-Mark
In reply to Re: Chatterbox Linguistics
by kvale
in thread Chatterbox Linguistics
by jZed
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |