But as for backwards compatibility - are you sure? Isn't the sorting of array references at this point essentially a random shuffle? (Meaning that it is unspecified, and could be different each time you run perl, not that it can be used in a situation where you actually need a random shuffle) Couldn't some order therefore be imposed upon it?
-- @/=map{[/./g]}qw/.h_nJ Xapou cets krht ele_ r_ra/; map{y/X_/\n /;print}map{pop@$_}@/for@/
In reply to Re^9: Benchmark, -s versus schwartzian (smarter [sort])
by fizbin
in thread Benchmark, -s versus schwartzian
by Darby
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |