I'm not against such an option (it would be neat and I'd use it for minor updates that didn't just fix typos). But I'd rather have people follow-up to their own nodes rather than make a major update to an existing node. Or if the motivation behind the update was some other node, then follow-up to the motivating node and update your old node to include a link to your new node.
One exception might be possible long-lived nodes like one holding the source code for the Tk Chatterbox client, for example.
- tye (but my friends call me "Tye")In reply to (tye)RE: Knowing when nodes are updated
by tye
in thread Knowing when nodes are updated
by KM
For: | Use: | ||
& | & | ||
< | < | ||
> | > | ||
[ | [ | ||
] | ] |