I'm not against such an option (it would be neat and I'd use it for minor updates that didn't just fix typos). But I'd rather have people follow-up to their own nodes rather than make a major update to an existing node. Or if the motivation behind the update was some other node, then follow-up to the motivating node and update your old node to include a link to your new node.
One exception might be possible long-lived nodes like one holding the source code for the Tk Chatterbox client, for example.
- tye (but my friends call me "Tye")In reply to (tye)RE: Knowing when nodes are updated
by tye
in thread Knowing when nodes are updated
by KM
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |