My bad! I was trying to keep the output simple.
I like the usage of a hash to store the subs, and also the cute (and much less verbose) &round.
Thanks!
In reply to Re^2: Dynamic function chains?
by keymon
in thread Dynamic function chains?
by keymon
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |