If I have time, I'll benchmark it later.

I was already benchmarking for the other responses, so I did it for you.

Here is the code

#!/usr/bin/perl use strict; use warnings; use Benchmark qw(:all); use Carp::Assert; sub CarpAssert { my ($test) = @_; assert($test < 50) if DEBUG; return $test; } sub OrAssert { my ($test) = @_; ($test < 50) || die "Test is wrong"; return $test; } my @nums = map { ((rand() * 100) % 50) } (0 .. 100); cmpthese(10_000, { 'CarpAssert' => sub { eval { CarpAssert($_) } for (@nums) }, 'OrAssert' => sub { eval { OrAssert($_) } for (@nums) }, });
Here is the results of this:
Benchmark: timing 10000 iterations of CarpAssert, OrAssert... CarpAssert: 11 wallclock secs ( 9.92 usr + 0.04 sys = 9.96 CPU) @ 10 +04.02/s (n=10000) OrAssert: 8 wallclock secs ( 7.14 usr + 0.03 sys = 7.17 CPU) @ 13 +94.70/s (n=10000) Rate CarpAssert OrAssert CarpAssert 1004/s -- -28% OrAssert 1395/s 39% --
I then tried turning off Carp::Assert, and it was only 3% faster than the OR assertions.
Benchmark: timing 10000 iterations of CarpAssert, OrAssert... CarpAssert: 9 wallclock secs ( 6.50 usr + 0.03 sys = 6.53 CPU) @ 15 +31.39/s (n=10000) OrAssert: 10 wallclock secs ( 6.72 usr + 0.02 sys = 6.74 CPU) @ 14 +83.68/s (n=10000) Rate OrAssert CarpAssert OrAssert 1484/s -- -3% CarpAssert 1531/s 3% --
I then changed the OR assertion to use a no-op error handler (as if they were off). Here is the modified sub
sub noOpError {} sub OrAssert { my ($test) = @_; ($test < 50) || noOpError("Test is wrong"); return $test; }
And surprisingly it slowed OR down
Benchmark: timing 10000 iterations of CarpAssert, OrAssert... CarpAssert: 6 wallclock secs ( 6.54 usr + 0.00 sys = 6.54 CPU) @ 15 +29.05/s (n=10000) OrAssert: 7 wallclock secs ( 7.11 usr + 0.02 sys = 7.13 CPU) @ 14 +02.52/s (n=10000) Rate OrAssert CarpAssert OrAssert 1403/s -- -8% CarpAssert 1529/s 9% --

An idea you might like to steal from it is to append if DEBUG to your assertions, where DEBUG is a constant that you can set to 1 in development/testing and to 0 in production. That way, you have all of the benefits of assertions in development, and none of the overhead in production (along with none of the benefits.)

Personally I do not like to turn off my assertions, I also see my debug statements as different from assertions. Besides IMO, having the if DEBUG at the end of the statement would really ruin the readability of it all.

-stvn

In reply to Re^2: Being more Assert-ive with Perl by stvn
in thread Being more Assert-ive with Perl by stvn

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.