I played around with this a while ago, but not in any great depth. As far as I can tell, it's possible to declare a sub inside another sub block, but any named subs you declare are globally accessible symbols.
If you want a truly local sub, your best bet is probably to build a closure lexically-scoped anonymous sub (thanks revdiablo):
sub foo { this; that; my $bar = sub { # ... }; # EDIT: this semi needs to be here if(cond) { $bar->(); } else { for (a loop) { something based on $_; $bar->(); } } }
It's cruftier than a local named sub, but it should do the trick.
--
F
o
x
t
r
o
t
U
n
i
f
o
r
m
Found a typo in this node? /msg me
% man 3 strfry
In reply to Re: Is it possible to create a sub exclusive to a sub?
by FoxtrotUniform
in thread Is it possible to create a sub exclusive to a sub?
by punkish
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |