&get_and_inc_foo is a closure, because it binds a lexical variable defined outside of it.

If my example is a closure, then aren't all subroutines closures over the file-scoped lexicals in the file they're defined in?

If they don't use any lexicals defined outside them, they're not closures. sub foo { 1 } isn't a closure no matter where it's defined.

my $foo; sub closure { $foo } sub not_closure { 1 }
What I mean with making the subroutine a lexical anonymous subroutine is the following.
my $foo; # lexical $foo = sub { $foo->() }; # closure local $bar; # dynamical $bar = sub { $bar->() }; # not a closure

ihb

Read argumentation in its context!


In reply to Re^6: Is it possible to create a sub exclusive to a sub? (nasty memory leak) by ihb
in thread Is it possible to create a sub exclusive to a sub? by punkish

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.