All I did was ask a simple question after RTFM, and after trying several different things, and after using SuperSearch. I'm not an idiot, nor am I lazy.All I did was answer the question (using your own words no less) without calling you an idiot or lazy. I can't help if you feel like an idiot.
So yeah, it ought to be really simple. But if that is the case, shouldn't I be able to make the test fail when the two hashes are different?But it is simple, and you can make the test fail, you just have to write it correctly. I thought that would be obvious once you understood how cmpStrHard works. ok( not cmpStrHard(\%crosslinks, \%crosslinkscorrect) );
Another thing I'm curious about: I mentioned that the test unexpectedly succeeded. There really isn't anything interesting when that happens. What information should I have provided?Something everyone can run that demonstrates your dilemma. Only you have access to JScan::ReadCrossLinks , ReadCrossLinks, \%crosslinks, \%options...
So PodMaster-- for posting and not actually helping. All I needed was confirmation that I was using FreezeThaw correctly. Too bad you couldn't do that, or at least keep silent.I know I helped ( I showed you that you're not using FreezeThaw correctly). I wasn't very explicit and verbose, but i thought it was obvious. Too bad you didn't get it.
In reply to Re^3: Using FreezeThaw correctly?
by PodMaster
in thread Using FreezeThaw correctly?
by Rhys
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |