That must be something new that I haven't dealt with yet. I would stick to the explitit definitions, myself. Maybe you need to change the order, if the above-mentioned checks only happen at definition time, and not when you call the resulting accessor methods.
In reply to Re^3: Class::DBI cascading delete problem?
by meredith
in thread Class::DBI cascading delete problem?
by zigdon
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |