I agree that I didn't give as many facts about my latest accusation as I could have, or normally would have, but I didn't care.
The copyright issue was the more minor of the points I raised in Boycott O'Reilly. If O'Reilly wanted more copyright protection, or the appearance of it, I think back-dating would be the thing to do. Maybe post-dating is legal under copyright law, if that's what you're saying, but it still sounds like a minor case of fraud to me. I consider those dates when I buy a computer book.
In reply to Re: Downvote for
by Wassercrats
in thread Abigail-II and some thoughts
by pg
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |