My guess is that sort is taking the majority of the time in your code. If your argument list is long enough passing it in as a list can take a decent chunk of time.
use Benchmark qw(cmpthese); @a = 1..1_000_000; sub flat { my $array = \@_ } sub flatcopy { my @copy = @_ } sub byref { my $array = $_[0] } sub refcopy { my @copy = @$_[0] } cmpthese(-1, { flat => sub { flat(@a) }, flatcopy => sub { flatcopy(@a) }, byref => sub { byref(@a) }, refcopy => sub { refcopy(@a) } }); __END__ Rate flatcopy flat refcopy byref flatcopy 3.24/s -- -77% -91% -91% flat 14.3/s 342% -- -59% -61% refcopy 35.3/s 987% 146% -- -3% byref 36.3/s 1020% 153% 3% --

In reply to Re: Show that using references is faster by Ven'Tatsu
in thread Show that using references is faster by Keystroke

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.