I'm surprised by the poor quality of this discussion
Some of it may be my fault. My initial question didn't describe the problem at all, only contained the sample data. I thought it would be obvious what I was getting at, but apparently I was wrong.
Try to write that query with each schema
Jenda did indeed illustrate the differences between the designs with sample queries for each one. This is a good general technique, though, and probably deserves to be emphasized. I'll keep it in mind in the future.
In reply to Re^2: OT: benefits of database normalization
by revdiablo
in thread OT: benefits of database normalization
by revdiablo
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |