That said, when I see a hash I hope for, "Operations are O(something much less than n)." When I see something involving sorts I hope for, "Let me specify a pairwise comparison function." Tie::Hash::Sorted fails to satisfy either hope, and so I'd be unlikely to reach for it for serious work. Sorry.
In reply to Re: RFC - Tie::Hash::Ranked
by tilly
in thread RFC - Tie::Hash::Ranked
by Limbic~Region
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |