Well, as he is obviously misinformed in some points, he does
make some statements which make sense to me. I share the idea that the perl5-6 transition can not be seen as anything
close to perl4-5, and that perl5 shouldn't be a target for
termination, not even in 20 years. Yes, I too think perl6 should be a fork, and that would make me much more comfortable about expanding my perl5 knowledge today. It sucks loving and studying a language which people are assuming will become obsolete in some time, and yes, perl5 and perl6 are _two different languages_, imho.