I said produce something. Not produce it and then promote it to the general public.
I did start to try and objectively try and consider whether anything had come out of Matt's script's that might be comsidered good. But then I realised that it would be pointless. Your question has nothing to do with what I said in the post to which you replied. Neither in isolation, nor in the context of the thread of which it is a part.
At this point, I am going to invoke Godwin's Law, as in my opinion, any reference to Matt's script's in the context of Perl programming is exactly equivalent.
In reply to Re^3: Make it good
by BrowserUk
in thread Make it good
by radiantmatrix
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |