Indeed.
I did partly forgot about the confirmation bias that effects the human brain. When trying to make a decision we value arguments that agree with us more and in higher degree dismiss arguments that don't agree. So yeah, it's a mixed bag.
I believe though, that if a sceptic reads a sceptic article that is well counter-argued he's more likely to change opinion than if he had read a positive article. If they go "yeah! exactly!" when reading the article which is well counter-argued, then it has not been positive or counter-arguing in general -- it has counter-argued directly with the reader. When that happens many feel forced to reevaluate their opinions since their opinions were counter-argued.
As always, it's all about how it's done...
ihb
Read argumentation in its context!
In reply to Re^3: Perl 6 critique is a good thing
by ihb
in thread Perl 6 critique is a good thing
by Juerd
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |