Surely that explanation applies to modules in general - not just of the OO flavour?
Modules are by nature designed to facilitate code reuse and naturally they (should) come with their own documentation.
How OO lends to a "fairly rigid testing structure" I'm not sure as, again, this seems to come under the heading of modules in general.
All code is untested unless otherwise stated.
In reply to Re^2: To use or not to use OO Perl
by gothic_mallard
in thread To use or not to use OO Perl
by monkfan
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |