Next is the program..#---Sample.pm--- package Sample; use warnings; use strict; use overload( '+' => \&add, fallback => 1, ); sub TIESCALAR { my $class = shift; my $self = { data => [@_], }; bless( $self, $class ); return $self; } sub add { $_ .= $_[1] foreach( @{$_[0]->{data}} ); } sub STORE { @{$_[0]->{data}} = (ref( $_[1] ) eq 'ARRAY') ? @{$_[1]}: ($_[1]); } sub FETCH { return $_[0]; } 1; #---------------
Compiler warnings/errors: (addition operation on the tie() variable $var1)#----code.pl---- use warnings; use strict; use Sample; my $var1; my $var2 = tie( $var1, 'Sample', 'black', 'white' ); # The assigment test... #$var1 = 'green'; #$var2 = ['green','red']; # The overload test... #$var1 + ' bishop'; #$var2 + ' bishop'; #print ref($var2),"\n"; print join( "\n", @{$var2->{data}} ); exit 0; #---------------
* The returned variable $var2 however, will cause the 1st warning but successfully calls the 'addition' Sample::add.Useless use of addition (+) in void context at code.pl line 28. Argument " bishop" isn't numeric in addition (+) at code.pl line 28.
The opposite works with assignment:
$var2 = ['green','red'] destroys the class instance of Sample and becomes an array reference.
$var1 = ['green','red'] works as it should because of tie()!
Both operations don't work on the same variable, $var1 can't do the addition + and $var2 can't do the assignment!
In reply to Re: Overloading assignment
by v_o_i_d
in thread Overloading assignment
by v_o_i_d
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |