Considering the enlightenemnt received so far I should modify my query thus:
With Perl CGI scripts configured to run under Apache::Registry is the increased memory footprint of mod_perl processes also incurred in static content generation? As I understand it you need to isolate the 2 to get round this issue via separate servers/ports/IPs. Is FastCGI/SpeedyCGI therefore a better solution if you aren't using Apache::Request and have more static content than dynamic?
In reply to Re: mod_perl without separate config for static HTML?
by gunzip
in thread mod_perl without separate config for static HTML?
by gunzip
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |