It just struck me reading yet another "I haven't quite yet made the leap to using strict and my..." story of woe that if it were made
Most installations needing backwards compatibility probably build their own, and would be able to cope with changing the default configuration.
an aweful lot of newbies would have been saved an aweful lot of pain by not building the seemingly insurmountable "barrier of experience" to using strict.
Ce la vie. History shows, but rarely shows it well.
In reply to Re^2: Why isn't C<use strict> the default?
by BrowserUk
in thread Why isn't C<use strict> the default?
by BrowserUk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |