Exactly... I really struggle to see who we're protecting with this backwards compatability issue. There's basically two groups
It seems to me there are simple solutions for both groups (either don't upgrade, or turn off strict).
Do we really want to protect these groups to the detriment of everyone else?
In reply to Re^3: Why isn't C<use strict> the default?
by Mutant
in thread Why isn't C<use strict> the default?
by BrowserUk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |