I think combining warnings and strict into one package, let's call it "caution", would help. Then we could "use caution".
I proposed exactly this years ago. I even registered the ex::caution namespace and put together an implementation. It wasnt particularly well received when I first brought it up, but maybe its worth returning to. Perl has moved on from then quite a bit.
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.
-- Gandhi
In reply to Re^2: Why isn't C<use strict> the default?
by demerphq
in thread Why isn't C<use strict> the default?
by BrowserUk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |