Bad idea IMHO. If you happen to combine a form out of several (mason) components and there is even a possibility, that someone in the future will add some components, you just pollute the namespace of the form that way. Of course, a programmer has to look at the code/docs before doing some extensions, but using same name different values, you reduce the number he has to cross-check from m * n to n.
Bye
PetaMem All Perl: MT, NLP, NLU
In reply to Re^2: Mason and (multiple) checkbox processing
by PetaMem
in thread Mason and (multiple) checkbox processing
by PetaMem
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |