SQL has no problem with it, and neither does Postgres. However, the basic structure of most RDBMSes have issues with data that is versioned over time. I run into this all the time with data warehousing. The solution isn't an SQL solution - it's a database engine solution, but those aren't going to be easy to have done.
The best solution that I've thought up is to modify the InnoDB engine to do three things:
I talked with Jeremy Zawodny back in June when I took his MySQL class and he said that, theoretically, it should work. But, he said that the issue was tuits and that it would come a lot faster if I had a few tuits to get it started. *shrugs*
Being right, does not endow the right to be rude; politeness costs nothing.
Being unknowing, is not the same as being stupid.
Expressing a contrary opinion, whether to the individual or the group, is more often a sign of deeper thought than of cantankerous belligerence.
Do not mistake your goals as the only goals; your opinion as the only opinion; your confidence as correctness. Saying you know better is not the same as explaining you know better.
In reply to Re^2: Conditional many to many relationships with Class::DBI
by dragonchild
in thread Conditional many to many relationships with Class::DBI
by BigLug
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |