If something like this isn't on CPAN, you should seriously consider putting it on there
I second that, although I would suggest better naming conventions. I am not a fan of abbreviations, and especially ones that are so similar and potentially confusing to the eye (i.e. - seq, spec).
In reply to Re^2: A mini-language for sequences (part 1)
by stvn
in thread A mini-language for sequences (part 1)
by tmoertel
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |