Your syllogisms are wrong.
He meant for them to be wrong, which is why he said:
Note that the two arguments below both rely on the same logical fallacy. The following is clearly false.
In reply to Re^4: Gods of perl
by kelan
in thread Gods of perl
by throttle
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |