It means the belief that "antigreedifier" make the aforementioned "at least one or more" optional is wrong.
"at least one or more" /.+/ still proves wrong if there is nothing.
Cheers, Sören
In reply to Re^3: Non-greedy regex behaves greedily
by Happy-the-monk
in thread Non-greedy regex behaves greedily
by fourmi
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |