ML has a TCL look to it,
Actually, TCL has a LISP look to it (this was explicitly mentioned in the orginal paper on TCL (external link)). Though it's far too limited to provide a lot of the cool-factor that LISP provides.
ML comes out of Functional Programming, just like LISP, so it's not that surprising that it looks a little like TCL to some people. But the similarties are only on the surface.
"There is no shame in being self-taught, only in not trying to learn in the first place." -- Atrus, Myst: The Book of D'ni.
In reply to Re: pathsearch/backtracking in Perl - how to solve a problem apparently requiring it? (comparison of Perl with Standard ML)
by hardburn
in thread pathsearch/backtracking in Perl - how to solve a problem apparently requiring it? (comparison of Perl with Standard ML)
by metaperl
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |