You see, the fetch operation is O(log n). What that means is that for sufficiently big tables IT DOES NOT (almost) DEPEND on size :) log(2000000) - log(1000000) = 1
That single fetch should be very fast on indexed tables. I'd suggest profiling before looking for places to optimize.
In reply to Re: Randomization as a cache clearing mechanism
by kappa
in thread Randomization as a cache clearing mechanism
by demerphq
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |