There's a trick that helps with deep structures:
my $flow_id = $data{partners}{$part_id}{flow}; for my $wfref (@{$data{flows}{$flow_id}}) { #... }
While not necessary here, you can always break things down further:
my $partner = $data{partners}; my $flow_id = $partner->{$part_id}{flow}; my $flows_ref = $data{flows}{$flow_id}}; for my $wfref (@$flows_ref) { #... }
or
my $flow_id = $data{partners}{$part_id}{flow}; my $flows_ref = $data{flows}{$flow_id}}; for my $wfref (@$flows_ref) { #... }
But in this case, I don't see why flows and partners are in the same structure
Change %{$data{flows }} to just %flows. Change %{$data{partners}} to just %partners.
In reply to Re^2: Pearls (not really) of Perl programming
by ikegami
in thread Pearls (not really) of Perl programming
by PetaMem
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |